Re^2: Review of CGI::Alternatives

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Review of CGI::Alternatives by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Jun 10, 2018 at 18:03 UTC
"...Nginx is a toy compared to Apache... My brand new Macbook Pro came loaded with Apache..." Sure. And a Macbook is a great platform to run a high-performance web server. And my cellphone is stronger than your fax machine. And my dick is a monster. Best regards, Karl P.S.: How many serious projects did you do with nginx - if any? ŤThe Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostropheť `perl -MCrypt::CBC -E 'say Crypt::CBC->new(-key=>'kgb',-cipher=>"Blowfish")->decrypt_hex($ENV{KARL});'`Help	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Review of CGI::Alternatives by Anonymous Monk on Jun 10, 2018 at 20:26 UTC
Perl is installed on all Macs. Mac is the dominant computer in schools. Most children have a Mac or access to one. They also have Apache and freakin mod_perl! Kids everywhere are being encouraged to learn programming. Connect those dots and we could produce Perl savants by the million. Why the hell are Perlmonks shitting on this golden opportunity? Don't forget your roots. Apache is a very high performance web server for 99% of use cases--despite some people's religious devotion to whatever happens to be considered "the best". Almost every gigantic corporation now dominating the web was created by some kid with a laptop in his spare time. Find a kid with a Mac. Open a terminal for them. Show them Perl!	[reply]
Re^5: Review of CGI::Alternatives by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Jun 10, 2018 at 21:20 UTC
The only one "shitting on" your proposal is you with your poisonous, backwards attitude and delusion that any disagreement comes from "religion" and not experience. Mod_perl is not the future, it is the past. CGI is not a best practice. Monolithic, kitchen sink architecture like it and apache is a dead end. Your stats about Mac are garbage and I'm a dyed in wool, 5 iPhone, 9 Mac owning shill for them. https://www.nginx.com/blog/nginx-vs-apache-our-view/ sums it all up nicely. Here's a pull quote, for others, I'm aware this will make no dent in your clearly ossified gray matter‐ In 2013, nginx was the most popular web server amongst the 1,000 busiest sites in the world. In 2014: the 10,000 busiest sites. In 2015: the 100,000 busiest. The section following about monolithic versus dynamic is enlightening for anyone looking to learn or expand skills.	[reply]
Re^6: Review of CGI::Alternatives by Anonymous Monk on Jun 11, 2018 at 02:16 UTC
Re^7: Review of CGI::Alternatives by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Jun 11, 2018 at 03:16 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^3: Review of CGI::Alternatives by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Jun 10, 2018 at 02:53 UTC
I'm an Apple user going back well before OS X; and an apache user since '98. Nginx is so much better than apache as a pure webserver that it is somewhat ridiculous. The idea that you think a toy, deeply popular with open source developers, could be eating the market share of every single other webserver because of fashion or corporate pressure shows that you're either not serious or don't know what you're talking about.	[reply]
Re^4: Review of CGI::Alternatives by Anonymous Monk on Jun 10, 2018 at 04:03 UTC
Apache and Nginx are apples and oranges. Trying to compare them seems pointless. They're best used together if one needs to handle huge traffic.	[reply]
Re^5: Review of CGI::Alternatives by Anonymous Monk on Jun 10, 2018 at 10:08 UTC
Apache and Nginx are apples and oranges. Trying to compare them seems pointless. They're best used together* if one needs to handle huge traffic.* LOL. Worst of both worlds.	[reply]