in reply to Re: Replacing CGI.pm
in thread Replacing CGI.pm
Also, PSGI/Plack might be contra-indicated depending on exactly how your application is now architected.
Rubbish. Unless there are scoping problems—which is essentially broken code and requires one to eschew strict—there is no reason to avoid persistent execution harnesses, fcgi, or psgi.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Replacing CGI.pm
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Jun 21, 2018 at 18:26 UTC | |
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Jun 21, 2018 at 18:47 UTC | |
| A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in. |