Re^6: The CPAN Apocalypse: June 25, 2018

If you're going to cite something as a source, at least read it

Please excuse my ignorance (everyone). I can only read about half of stackoverflow because they use google javascript, so I don't expand the discussions. It's not usually a problem while seeking wisdom but this time I got bit, and now the downvotes make perfect sense.

But I was very serious about the camel favicon ☺

_{STOP REINVENTING WHEELS, START BUILDING SPACE ROCKETS!—CPAN} 🐫

Comment on Re^6: The CPAN Apocalypse: June 25, 2018

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: The CPAN Apocalypse: June 25, 2018 by marto (Cardinal) on Jun 21, 2018 at 06:44 UTC
"But I was very serious about the camel favicon ☺" You seemed 'serious' about all the points you made, but none of them are true. You are aware you can't see all the responses to yet make an accusation based upon an incorrect comment from a random internet user? The statement that "it's already broken: redirects "fix" it.", demonstrably incorrect. I see the favicon for search.cpan without issue, tested on several machines, different networks and browsers. Regarding the metacpan favicon, as far as 'What do they mean?', if you look at the metacpan logo this should be apparent.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^7: The CPAN Apocalypse: June 25, 2018
by marto (Cardinal) on Jun 21, 2018 at 06:44 UTC

"But I was very serious about the camel favicon ☺"

You seemed 'serious' about all the points you made, but none of them are true. You are aware you can't see all the responses to yet make an accusation based upon an incorrect comment from a random internet user? The statement that "it's already broken: redirects "fix" it.", demonstrably incorrect. I see the favicon for search.cpan without issue, tested on several machines, different networks and browsers. Regarding the metacpan favicon, as far as 'What do they mean?', if you look at the metacpan logo this should be apparent.

[reply]