Re^2: Multiple Packages in a Module?

haukex: ...the equivalent of use would be BEGIN { require test_v1; Foo->import(); Foo::Bar->import(); }.

Actually, no. The equivalent would be BEGIN { require test_v1; test_v1->import; }.

Comment on Re^2: Multiple Packages in a Module?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Multiple Packages in a Module? by haukex (Archbishop) on Jun 25, 2018 at 20:45 UTC
Actually, no. The equivalent would be `BEGIN { require test_v1; test_v1->import; }`. No, because I wrote "in the case you describe", which is that there is one file `test_v1.pm` with two packages, `Foo` and `Foo::Bar` (no mention of a `package test_v1`). The code I showed is the equivalent of splitting that one file into two (`Foo.pm` and `Foo/Bar.pm`) and `use`ing them individually.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Multiple Packages in a Module? by haj (Vicar) on Jun 25, 2018 at 21:08 UTC
Agreed. I seem to have had difficulties with identifying "in the case you describe" as splitting one file into two.	[reply]
Re^5: Multiple Packages in a Module? by haukex (Archbishop) on Jun 25, 2018 at 21:32 UTC
My first reply was a bit terse, I've added an update to hopefully clarify what I meant.	[reply]