in reply to Re^2: why is this an uninitialized value?
in thread why is this an uninitialized value?

This node falls below the community's minimum standard of quality and will not be displayed.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: why is this an uninitialized value?
by kcott (Archbishop) on Jun 30, 2018 at 22:12 UTC

    So, jdorwin joins the Monastery and posts for the first time.

    On the next visit there's a notification along the lines of "you have a response from sundialsvc4 regarding your question: why is this an uninitialized value?".

    However, when following the link to your response, this does not appear to be a response to the posted question at all; instead, it looks like some sort of attack followed by a demand to "knock it off".

    You should immediately apologise to jdorwin and consider your node for reparenting.

    — Ken

Re^2: why is this an uninitialized value?
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 30, 2018 at 15:45 UTC
    Here we go again
    Just let my comments rest, please, even if they are unrelated to one another as here. Say whatever you please, then click the Back button on your browser instead of Send. I am tired of always being on the defensive – ’nuff said, knock it off.
    You should take your own advice. Just stop posting. You add nothing. You need to talk to a therapist. All your lies, tales of "work" and the problems you fix. All lies. You don't know anything.
Re^2: why is this an uninitialized value?
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 01, 2018 at 19:59 UTC
    In some languages a sundialsvc is a type of latrine floater. Its stinks. Flush it.™