in reply to Output redirection using “require” in perl

You appear to have posted this as Sandeep Vickey, deleted the title and content, then reposted it as Sandeep Kumar (i.e. the node I'm responding to now).

The first post is empty as I write this but has been considered for restoration. The link is currently "Reaped:" (the title should change after restoration).

While it's not good to mess us around like that, I'm more concerned with your multiple accounts. Please read "Site Rules Governing User Accounts" and act accordingly (for however many accounts you may have).

Please also read "How do I change/delete my post?".

— Ken

  • Comment on Re: Output redirection using “require” in perl

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Output redirection using “require” in perl
by haukex (Archbishop) on Jul 03, 2018 at 09:50 UTC

    Yes, it's left a bit of a mess. I would have considered my node for reparenting first if I had seen and considered the nodes in a different order.

    Update: Ok, I've done that now, I guess I'll leave it up to the voters and janitors...

      Yes, that is a mess.

      I'd already voted "Edit" to restore to first one. I've now voted "Edit" to reparent your response; and "Keep" for the OP in this thread.

      — Ken

Re^2: Output redirection using “require” in perl
by Sandeep Kumar (Novice) on Jul 04, 2018 at 05:26 UTC
    Sorry for the mess sir, As I have recently joined the site, so wasn't aware of the rules. I apologize for this. I will surely follow the site rules from now onwards. Thanks & Regards, Sandeep.