in reply to Re: Efficient enumeration of pandigital fractions
in thread Efficient enumeration of pandigital fractions

No, I'm satisfied for the time being :)

(I see that I've nerd sniped (xkcd://356) you quite effectively with this problem, so my work is done here :)

  • Comment on Re^2: Efficient enumeration of pandigital fractions

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Efficient enumeration of pandigital fractions
by LanX (Saint) on Jul 22, 2018 at 21:01 UTC
    > I see that I've nerd sniped you quite effectively

    he, he ... you earned 3 points.

    And actually I'm clever enough to resist implementing an algorithm which solves base-20 in way under 1 sec ...*

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
    Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice

    *) definitely .. I won't ... I swear ... never ...

      FYI a straightforward reimplementation of your program in C does base 20 in 1.06 s (for comparison, the Perl version (perversion) finishes in 23 s on my machine).
        That's interesting.

        FYI I was talking about Perl on my machine... :)

        Cheers Rolf
        (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
        Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice

        PS: which was probably too ambitious, but 5 sec (i.e. factor 10) is certainly within reach.