Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors by marto (Cardinal) on Jul 26, 2018 at 08:14 UTC
"Once Anonymous Monk is gone" This isn't going to happen. One user repeatedly, for literally years, suggested that Anonymous posting be removed, and it hasn't happened, despite said user sometimes posting anonymously due to incompetence.	[reply]
Re: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Jul 26, 2018 at 00:14 UTC
It’s not about anonymonk. It’s about shitposts. Seems a topic you’d have a better grasp on.	[reply]
Re: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors by LanX (Saint) on Jul 26, 2018 at 13:15 UTC
Your very bad post has been hidden ... \o/ Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors by anonymized user 468275 (Curate) on Aug 01, 2018 at 09:13 UTC
Is this an example of very bad post? Let's see. Well, the language quality is poor enough; what about the logic, the argument construction? Nope, can't find anything of that nature. So the obvious question is, would censoring this kind of post, i.e. the OP, improve the desirability of the forum. I suppose the answer is that poor quality posters probably would like to allow others to be as poor and preferably poorer, whereas quality posters would prefer not to be associated with poor posters. But there's always the Groucho effect to consider ;) One world, one people	[reply]