Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors

Without hiding it this would only motivate some to collect this "message" as a badge of honor.

I also think a mark (for logged in users that is) should have a more neutral wording.

Assuming that its "bad content" depends on the POV, that's why I suggested "Disputed:" (which fits into the "Reaped:" model)

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery
FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}

Comment on Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors by trippledubs (Deacon) on Jul 31, 2018 at 01:29 UTC
This thread is officially discouraged. We don't discourage all threads, but when we do, we discourage this one. Even these threads are better than this. We'll tell you what threads to use and what threads not to use. threads can be improved faster than this one.	[reply]