Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors

For me this patch is just a variant of the "reap"-consideration

This is exactly why I'm very ambivalent about this change.

We already have a process in place for removing nodes from the public eye, and this adds a second way that bypasses the established process.

Comment on Re^3: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors by LanX (Saint) on Aug 06, 2018 at 11:20 UTC
Yep we should wait and see. At the moment it's hard to say how the dynamic goes. But I'm expecting less reaps in the future. And I think it depends a lot on the decision algorithm. What I don't like is to have to separate entities for similar functionality, which raises the software complexity even more... Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

At the moment it's hard to say how the dynamic goes.

But I'm expecting less reaps in the future.

And I think it depends a lot on the decision algorithm.

What I don't like is to have to separate entities for similar functionality, which raises the software complexity even more...

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery
FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}