Re: Prototype Mismatch Errors

On another note, don't you activate warnings ?

I'm surprised you're not seeing any "subroutine redefined" errors.

(can't test ATM)

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery
FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}

Comment on Re: Prototype Mismatch Errors

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Prototype Mismatch Errors by hippo (Archbishop) on Aug 08, 2018 at 08:05 UTC
$ cat use.pl #!/usr/bin/env perl use strict; use warnings; use POSIX; use Date::Format; $ ./use.pl Prototype mismatch: sub main::strftime: none vs ($\@;$) at /usr/share/ +perl5/vendor_perl/Exporter.pm line 66. at ./use.pl line 5. Prototype mismatch: sub main::ctime: none vs ($;$) at /usr/share/perl5 +/vendor_perl/Exporter.pm line 66. at ./use.pl line 5. Prototype mismatch: sub main::asctime: none vs (\@;$) at /usr/share/pe +rl5/vendor_perl/Exporter.pm line 66. at ./use.pl line 5. $ perl -v \| head -3 This is perl 5, version 20, subversion 3 (v5.20.3) built for x86_64-li +nux-thread-multi (with 16 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail) [download] I would hypothesise that because the prototypes are different, the subroutines are not actually redefined. Just a guess, though.	[reply] [d/l]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: Prototype Mismatch Errors
by hippo (Archbishop) on Aug 08, 2018 at 08:05 UTC

$ cat use.pl 
#!/usr/bin/env perl 
use strict;
use warnings;
use POSIX;
use Date::Format;
$ ./use.pl 
Prototype mismatch: sub main::strftime: none vs ($\@;$) at /usr/share/
+perl5/vendor_perl/Exporter.pm line 66.
 at ./use.pl line 5.
Prototype mismatch: sub main::ctime: none vs ($;$) at /usr/share/perl5
+/vendor_perl/Exporter.pm line 66.
 at ./use.pl line 5.
Prototype mismatch: sub main::asctime: none vs (\@;$) at /usr/share/pe
+rl5/vendor_perl/Exporter.pm line 66.
 at ./use.pl line 5.
$ perl -v | head -3

This is perl 5, version 20, subversion 3 (v5.20.3) built for x86_64-li
+nux-thread-multi
(with 16 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail)
[download]

I would hypothesise that because the prototypes are different, the subroutines are not actually redefined. Just a guess, though.

[reply]
[d/l]