in reply to Re^10: The Future of Perl 5
in thread The Future of Perl 5
> In the short term, having a not-quite-ready interpreter branded as the successor for Perl 5 does seem like it may have done some damage to Perl's marketability, but in the long term, the Perl 6 effort is necessary for Perl's survival.
This could have easily been solved by branding "Perl 6" something like "Perl++"*
A classic example of Osborning.
(DISCLAIMER: This is no excuse whatsoever for Perl6 bashing!)
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice
*) I was told in Riga/2011 that it's too late to rename. Just imagine ...
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^12: The Future of Perl 5
by tobyink (Canon) on Aug 27, 2018 at 19:47 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 27, 2018 at 21:05 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 28, 2018 at 00:49 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 28, 2018 at 01:35 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 28, 2018 at 07:50 UTC | |
| |
by bliako (Abbot) on Aug 28, 2018 at 10:47 UTC | |
|