in reply to Re^3: div in cgi
in thread div in cgi

"The OP asked about CGI::Pretty, silly."

Sure, but OP also doesn't know what they're doing and has a history of scrambling around for solutions to whatever the task of the day is, seemingly without wanting to either understand the proposed solutions or properly explain what they're end goal is...

"It's not my fault the new dictator of CGI::Pretty is too incompetent to...

Harsh words, have you offered to take over maintenance? Or release a fork which does all this?

"It's not broken until a browser tries to render it. You make too many false assumptions."

You don't know what will be parsing this, you seem to be making assumptions yourself.

"Mr. President? You pushed the wrong button, again!"

Let's hope not.

Ignore everything but the technical and there's still a valid point, why even steer someone who is clearly new to this, does not really know what they're doing, down a route which is a worse path then even a basic templating system such as HTML::Template.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: div in cgi
by Anonymous Monk on Sep 14, 2018 at 06:36 UTC

    Ignore everything but the technical and there's still a valid point, why even steer someone who is clearly new to this, does not really know what they're doing, down a route which is a worse path then even a basic templating system such as HTML::Template.

    Its been 4 years, that iceberg cannot be steered

      Perhaps you have a point there.