mandog has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:
A few months ago, I moved to 5.6.1 because the scripts I wrote in ActiveState puked on Debian potato / perl 5.04. I did stuff like use our instead of my and use warnings instead of /usr/bin/perl -w I've read through the perldelta docs and there doesn't seem like working in two versions of perl would hurt too badly. I'm smarter than I was a few months ago :->
Am I missing something?
btw, my feelings aren't hurt at the prospect of rejection. I offer some nice stuff, but my deal depends entirely on me and my handshake with some folks in the University. If I get hit by a beer truck, my co-workers can probably help people move to another setup, but things will be a little tense.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: v5.04 vs 5.6.n versions of perl
by tstock (Curate) on Oct 31, 2001 at 12:28 UTC | |
|
Re: v5.04 vs 5.6.n versions of perl
by kwoff (Friar) on Nov 01, 2001 at 06:18 UTC |