You seem to be assuming that the unescaped quote will never be followed by a comma (or white space and then a comma, or perhaps a newline). Actually, amelinda's use of the word "other" makes me suspect that this assumption is likely true in this particular case. (:

But I felt it important that readers not get the wrong impression about how well such "not really CSV" data can ever be handled in general. You have to draw the line somewhere. As I said, I find it quite reasonable to draw the line at "your embedded quotes must be escaped". But if you cross that line, there still has to be another line such as "your unescaped embedded quotes must not be followed by...".

To be honest, I never seriously considered such an option. And then when you mentioned it, the phrase "that way lies madness" (in an appropriately Halloween voice) came to mind. Then I switched to, "well, that would be fairly easy to add." Then I thought about exactly how to do it and recalled how many times I've seen brilliant people that were regex experts get the "match C-style comments" regex wrong and started to have doubts again.

Perhaps trying something like /'([^']|'(?! *[,\n]))*'/ to match single-quoted fields would work. But I think I'd probably backtrack at this point and say that adding support for that has too high of a risk of introducing bugs. Perhaps making it optional could aleviate that risk when the option isn't selected. Perhaps you have more confidence in your ability to solve that problem correctly than I do in mine. :)

        - tye (but my friends call me "Tye")