in reply to Sharing data "cache" between forked processes

all databases I've looked at would need a ramdisk, since they don't support in-memory connections from multiple processes.

Doubtless I am misunderstanding here but does the memory engine of MariaDB not satisfy your requirements? I've used it for lower-latency stores in several projects (including FCGI-based access) without problems. Could you explain where this falls short for you?

  • Comment on Re: Sharing data "cache" between forked processes