in reply to Re: Broken cpan shell
in thread Broken cpan shell

Oh, sorry, I must have copied from the wrong shell command in bash history. Anyway, this should be correct:
stan@linux-pwfe:~> sudo perl -d -MCPAN -e shell [sudo] password for root: Loading DB routines from perl5db.pl version 1.53 Editor support available. Enter h or 'h h' for help, or 'man perldebug' for more help. main::(-e:1): shell *** buffer overflow detected ***: perl terminated Aborted stan@linux-pwfe:~>

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Broken cpan shell
by kcott (Archbishop) on Jan 15, 2019 at 06:15 UTC

    You have completely changed your original post. My response to what you originally wrote now makes absolutely no sense.

    Please read "How do I change/delete my post?". In particular, the section entitled "It is uncool to update a node in a way that renders replies confusing or meaningless".

    — Ken

      I thought about it, but it's not just a matter of one small strike-through over misspelling.

      Your reply begins with a clear reference to a typo and the edited version of the OP now clearly states that a typo has been corrected. I didn't think anyone would be confused by your suggested correction, by what it refers to, by how it makes sense, or think any less of your advice. It is followed by me posting outcome of a correct command and then another person's suggestion to edit the OP, which I did. Sorry if I slighted you in the process.

        It's not that I feel slighted. The issue is that viewers of this thread, who come to it after your change, will be confused. I indicated changing '-MCAN': I've just done a search of the entire thread; my response is currently the only place where '-MCAN' exists.

        In terms of striking out large tracts of content, that certainly does happen. Something like this is not that unusual:

        Sorry, I completely misread your question. Please ignore.

        ... original text ...

        ... original code ...

        If you feel that the stricken content is likely to be highly distracting, consider hiding it with <readmore> or <spoiler>. Perhaps something like:

        Oops! I got that terribly wrong. The original content is in the spoiler; the intended (better) content follows:

        ... better text ...

        ... better code ...

        — Ken

Re^3: Broken cpan shell
by RMGir (Prior) on Jan 14, 2019 at 18:41 UTC
    Looks unpleasant :(

    I can't help with this one, but I suggest you edit the original post to indicate the actual issue - folks might miss the problem if it's buried in an Re^2.


    Mike
      Yeah, I've edited the OP. Thank you.