in reply to Re^6: Multiplication digit persistence
in thread Multiplication digit persistence

I think the problem with many amateurs is not that they don't have good ideas but that they don't know how to read the surrounding literature.

They either tend to reinvent the wheel or even worse try to invent things which are proven not to exist.

I know about professors which get letters with "revolutionary" solutions for popular problems every week.

The spamming has an extent that some revolutionary things were only published in unknown publications and had to be discovered there.

Btw I still consider me an amateur here, if I was seriously interested to solve it I'd spend a weekly only searching publications.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: Multiplication digit persistence
by johngg (Canon) on Mar 29, 2019 at 10:44 UTC

    It has been interesting to read the discussion back and forth following my post. I do not have a degree in anything and failed abysmally at high school pure mathematics (applied mathematics I was good at as I could see a real-world use for what I was trying to learn) so my approach to the problem was purely empirical. I can't even qualify as an amateur mathematician as attempts to read the literature tell me that I don't understand the language being employed, I just hear a whoosh as it goes over my head.

    However, I did very much enjoy writing the code and playing around with ideas so I'm grateful to tobyink for starting the thread!

    Cheers,

    JohnGG

      The difference between pure and applied math is often only a century.

      Much of discrete mathematics started with entertaining riddles, evolved to pure math and later became one cornerstone computer science.

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
      Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice