Re^12: Getting for() to accept a tied array in one statement

Perhaps we need to consult p5p before deeming it as a bug :-)

Comment on Re^12: Getting for() to accept a tied array in one statement

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^13: Getting for() to accept a tied array in one statement by ikegami (Patriarch) on Apr 28, 2019 at 19:13 UTC
The fact that `for ((), @a)` calls it once means you're relying on internal implementation. Whether you call it bug or undefined behaviour doesn't matter.	[reply] [d/l]