in reply to How do you feel about mod_perl?
Other people reactions sum it up for me: speed,
flexibility, Apache apis...
Except the last 2 are (I feel) liabilities for people which
need to keep IIS and other webservers in view. So I write orderly CGI stuff that runs under mod_perl but will do its thing (if slowly) under IIS with vanilla CGI (and that's already nontrivial).
As for cross-platformness of Apache and friends - it is there, but only to a point. I have been recently badly bitten on the a... - well, you get the idea - by mod_perl being single threaded on Win32 - a fact that is very carefully buried under a ton and a half of carpets. Because I write to CGI.pm I narrowly escaped disaster - had I gone the full mod_perl way it would have been a very nasty situation.
Cheers,
alf
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: How do you feel about mod_perl?
by perrin (Chancellor) on Nov 06, 2001 at 01:54 UTC |