in reply to Re: Re: Page Expiration
in thread Page Expiration
Perl Monks isn't the only site that doesn't deal with Web caches properly, but that's no reason for it to violate HTTP standards.
If an HTTP response makes no statement as to what a cache should do with it (no Last-Modified, Expires or Cache-Control), the document is considered cacheable.
I disagree that cache administrators should be held responsible for creating workarounds for non-compliant sites. Web site/application developers should be responsible for ensuring their code works properly.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
(maverick) Re 4: Page Expiration
by maverick (Curate) on Nov 10, 2001 at 01:44 UTC | |
by buckaduck (Chaplain) on Nov 10, 2001 at 02:40 UTC |