in reply to sybperl for cygwin

If you like the challenge, don't let me stop you -- it's always cool to test your abilities and knowledge. At the same time, I wonder if you'd be better off moving to the better-supported DBI setup, and using something like Apache::DBI for persistence.

Just some ideas to think about. And, of course, you may have very valid reasons for using sybperl, in which case please continue, and good luck.

----Asim, known to some as Woodrow.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: sybperl for cygwin
by mdupont (Scribe) on Nov 13, 2001 at 22:56 UTC
    Asim,

    There is a difference between DBD::Sybase and sybperl which I both use. They depend on the c-library ctlib, of which there is a replacement freetds that also works with sybperl.

    Point being the problems with linking to a windows library using cygwin.

    The code in DBD::Sybase also uses the base of the sybperl functionality of the open client library.

    mdupont