in reply to Re (tilly) 3: Efficiency in maintenance coding...
in thread Efficiency in maintenance coding...
No Schwartzian Transform is required. Does Java let you easily sort ignoring case? How about by length?...
You might find that a ST executes faster for that second case (and you could almost certainly speed it up with one of several techniques that are faster in Perl than an ST), but I doubt the speed gain would be worthwhile since lc() shouldn't be that slow.sort { $freq{$a} <=> $freq{$b} } keys %freq sort { lc($a) cmp lc($b) || $a cmp $b } keys %freq sort { length($a) <=> length($b) || lc($a) cmp lc($b) || $a cmp $b } keys %freq
Speeding up the third case with a ST would be more difficult than using some other sort-speeding techniques (many of which have names that I don't recall). Though you'd have to have a whole lot of different words for the trade off of sort speed for code complexity to be a "win" here, especially since we are trying to write very maintainable code.
- tye (but my friends call me "Tye")
|
---|