in reply to Re: Re: Re: XPs and real experience
in thread XPs and real experience
I think you're confusing things. we're talking about the same thing now... I'm saying that ++ should be for "interesting" postings, be they on perl skillness or whatever interesting can be, not necessarily capability. I was just criticizing 200 and more points and one single posting rated 5 points. I'm happy for the guy if he is.
I wrote about just because I don't get the meaning of those points if they are called "Experience" points and given also for frequentation of the site. They would be more appropriately "Frequent surfer" points. This also would give the right credit to guys that are not perl gurus but keep the site alive and unique as it is.
However, I understand all this got too far. sorry for boring with old discussions. I'm probably not frequently enough here.