in reply to Re: Calling Interrupts from Perl
in thread Calling Interrupts from Perl

Blake, Since you like *public forums*, I thought I would reply to you here. I know what ESR says and keep in mind that he is not god (He lives nearby - West Chester,PA). I put my email in the message and asked for replies to BOTH here and my email. Why? Because I spend a ton of time on various sites and writing Open Source software and wasn't sure if I'd have time to get back here.
Secondly, Once I figure out hos to accomplish this I intend to write a perl module for everyone to use. I'm hoping to avoid building a .xs in C.

So - if this sounds like a flame directed towards you - it is sort of.
I've been working with the Internet since before it was called the Internet, and I just get tired of people in recent time getting so F**KING wound up all the time.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re3: Calling Interrupts from Perl
by blakem (Monsignor) on Nov 25, 2001 at 16:36 UTC
    Perhaps you misunderstood my point... When I came across your node it was on the Worst Nodes of The Day list (at -4), even though it contained a valid question. I was just giving you a friendly nudge to let you know *why* people were downvoting your node.

    At the very least, you should have explained why someone kind enough to answer your question should also shoulder the burden of replying in a non-standard way. "Also send me an email because I check my email more often than I check perlmonks" isn't as bad as "Also send me email because I'm a taker and never plan on coming back." You would have done well to distinguish between them.

    -Blake

    Last time I posted this quote I noted my feelings on ESR (which are somewhat short of godly) but it isn't really relevant what I think of the author....