in reply to Perl IS a programming language, right?
As for Java I wouldn't take any statement in the direction of clean design, portability and other things from a JavaCockey for serious if I look at the flaws the language already piled up in so few years of existance compared to the lifetime of other languages I don't want to start a flame war here - I simply don't like the language. There is no reason at all to take me for serious here :-)
I'm not really a CompSciProfessional, I'm just argueing from the heart, and many real professionals always come down to (common) lisp if it comes to clean everything.
I am quite happy with perl (just as I am with ruby ;-) - it did many jobs for me, with or without specs. Just my TwoCents...
| Regards... | Stefan |
| you begin bashing the string with a +42 regexp of confusion | |
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re(2): Perl IS a programming language, right?
by dmmiller2k (Chaplain) on Dec 06, 2001 at 03:04 UTC |