Ellem, I can hardly believe your boss could do such a thing!?
I remember myself at a few code reviews for my perl programs,
and even that was a little tense. I later came to terms with
the idea of code reviews and saw their impact as to the
'betterment' of my code.
However, your boss just scolded you right there!
I think that if your code was indeed "obvious", "clear", "over commented",
and (above all) "cautious", then I'd step in and support it.
Clearly, these are the qualities that do not hurt one's code
but rather make it maintainable and less bug-prone.
PS: I'm absolutely with you on your commnet about "that junk".
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels." -- Confession of Faith
|
| [reply] |
Do you like your job? Not to be a smart-ass, but this sounds really bad to me. ESPECIALLY other people going along with it. Now the other stuff is up to your boss I guess, but I find the "over commented" part hard to swallow. I mean comments are what allow people to easily look at code without thinking "what was the guy who wrote this trying to do". To me this all sounds like a formula for disaster down the road. I'm not sure I'd be too particular on a boss ripping my code in front of everyone for being too clear either. | [reply] |