in reply to Re (tilly) 3: DWIM Part Nineteen: Unary Operators in Void Context
in thread DWIM Part Nineteen: Unary Operators in Void Context
So, if you were going to call my bluff, it should probably have been over a module like Inline::Files, where I do change the semantics of an existing construct!
Of course, you may well mean something quite different by "customization", in which case we're just arguing over (a different form of) semantics. ;-)
|
|---|