in reply to Re(3): do/redo or for(;;): what's Kosher?
in thread do/redo or for(;;): what's Kosher?
I'm pretty sure that the reason is:
which I'd still use while(1) for. Plus it allows you to do:{ # do loop stuff to be done at least once last if BREAK-CONDITION; # do middle loop stuff <<< This part was left out redo; }
where it is very easy to throw in a new check or new code in. But, as I said elsewhere, I find that power to be too easy to abuse. YMMV. - tye (but my friends call me "Tye"){ # read next line last if NoMoreLines # extract item from line redo if NoItemInLine last if EndOfItemListFound # categorize item redo if WrongItemCategory # check for updates redo if NoUpdatesThisCategory; # check permissions last if NoUpdatesAllowed; redo if ThisUpdateNotAllowed; # do update redo if NotFatal; # handle fatal error # (note, no "redo" here so this part isn't really # part of the "loop", just stuff to do once unless # "last" gets triggered above.) } # done with items
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re(tye 2): do/redo or for(;;): what's Kosher?
by dmmiller2k (Chaplain) on Jan 06, 2002 at 08:34 UTC |