in reply to Re: recurse directory script
in thread recurse directory script

BTW, subroutine calls no longer require the & prefix character. Using them makes your code unnecessarily more difficult to read.

To the contrary, I find that prepending an & to subroutine calls makes my code easier to read. For one thing, it helps some syntax-hilighting editors hilight the subs, which is helpful. For another, it keeps with the theme of "everything with a sigil is a thingy that you can take a reference to", which I find helpful as well. The obvious caveat is that the & makes the current @_ visible to the subroutine; this hasn't bitten me in the ass yet, though.

--
:wq

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re (tilly) 3: recurse directory script
by tilly (Archbishop) on Jan 10, 2002 at 07:24 UTC
    I prefer leaving off the & because I have to program in multiple languages, and like to preserve some visual uniformity.

    But if you include it, as long as you also use parens you will not re-use @_. So you can put your mind at ease on that detail...