in reply to Depth of AoAs

There are two small problems with this code - The first is that you have called the subroutine depth yet reference it within the subroutine as dimensions. Has anyone ever told you that recursion is evil? :-)

Also, if the subroutine is called with something other than an array reference, it still returns a count of 1.

 

Update

This code addresses the issues above and returns the correct reference depth of the array.

sub depth { return 0 unless ref $_[0] eq 'ARRAY'; return depth( ${$_[0]}[0] ) + 1; }

Or alternatively, without recursion ...

sub depth { my $array = shift; my $count = 0; while (ref $array eq 'ARRAY') { $array = ${$array}[0]; ++$count; } return $count; }

 

Update

Okay ... So I was curious and went ahead and benchmarked these subroutines and was pleasantly surprised with the result.

Benchmark: timing 100000 iterations of loop, recursion... loop: 6 wallclock secs ( 5.30 usr + 0.00 sys = 5.30 CPU) @ 18 +867.92/s (n=100000) recursion: 6 wallclock secs ( 5.87 usr + 0.00 sys = 5.87 CPU) @ 17 +035.78/s (n=100000)

 

And the code used for the benchmarking ...

#!/usr/bin/perl use Benchmark; use strict; timethese (100000, { 'recursion' => q! sub depth { return 0 unless ref $_[0] eq 'ARRAY'; return depth( ${$_[0]}[0] ) + 1; }; my $array = [ [ [ 1 ], [ 1 ] ], [ [ 1 ], [ 1 ] ]]; my $result = depth($array); !, 'loop' => q! sub depth { my $array = shift; my $count = 0; while (ref $array eq 'ARRAY') { $array = ${$array}[0]; ++$count; } return $count; } my $array = [ [ [ 1 ], [ 1 ] ], [ [ 1 ], [ 1 ] ]]; my $result = depth($array); ! });
perl -e 's&&rob@cowsnet.com.au&&&split/[@.]/&&s&.com.&_&&&print'