Thanks for your comment. I agree on the VISUAL misleading of the data. However, even though the data looks like it's divided by
"\n//\n", the code is actually separating by
"//\n" only, leaving one extra "\n" in the data after
chomping.
I presented the data that way because I has in mind fortunes files, where records are separated by a "\n%%\n".
_ _ _ _
(_|| | |(_|><
_|