in reply to Fore!!! (was The Perl Review)
in thread The Perl Review
PS If you read the problem statement carefully, there is a 1 character answer:sub h{ # 1 2 3 4 #23456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_12345678 ($_,$s)=@_;y/A-Z/:-T/;$s=36*$s-48+ord for/./g;$s }
tilly duckssub convert_0 { 0 }
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re (tilly) 2: Fore!!! (was The Perl Review)
by blakem (Monsignor) on Feb 02, 2002 at 00:14 UTC | |
by tilly (Archbishop) on Feb 02, 2002 at 00:44 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Feb 02, 2002 at 00:53 UTC | |
by blakem (Monsignor) on Feb 02, 2002 at 01:16 UTC | |
|
Re: Re (tilly) 2: Fore!!! (was The Perl Review)
by jackdied (Monk) on Feb 02, 2002 at 10:06 UTC | |
by tilly (Archbishop) on Feb 02, 2002 at 14:54 UTC |