in reply to Re: REGEX question
in thread REGEX question

Japhy! Good 2CU again (RIP perlguru.com)

Thanx for the code...I figured I couldn't start off with the UC and LC (as these would have just been looked at as part of the string replace.

I'll assume (for now) that this is good (all your other stuff has been). I am in the middle of debugging a ton of other stuff. but should get to this later 2nite.

Cheers

Sean Shrum
sean@shrum.net

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: REGEX question
by S_Shrum (Pilgrim) on Feb 14, 2002 at 12:03 UTC

    Nix that last post from me...I had some stray test code in the script that was doing bad things.

    I tried the code you provided and nothing seems to be happening to the tokens on the template. No errors are being generated either ;-).

    Any other ideas???

    Thanx for all your help to date.

    ======================
    Sean Shrum
    http://www.shrum.net