in reply to RE: Re: Constant Functions
in thread Constant Functions

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: RE: Re: Constant Functions
by floopy (Sexton) on May 24, 2000 at 11:12 UTC
    I believe the author was referring to c as in the speed of light, not the language :)
      That is correct sir. I was refering to the speed of light in a vacuum.

      Update: I just want to know what kind of jerk votes down a simple clarifier like this one. Who ever you are you have way too many votes to be wasting them like that.

        <SIGH>