Re: Re: Re: Re: Do regex using hash keys to wrapped template tokens

strict is in there (just commented out for right now ;-) I'm just taking care of the big bugs first...I can work on formalizing it later

%input is a CGI created hash of a hash if I understand it correctly.

Supplying just for (param) is not enough, right? I tried it with no success. How do I reference the param portion of %input for the FOR loop.

TIA

======================
Sean Shrum
http://www.shrum.net

Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Do regex using hash keys to wrapped template tokens Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Do regex using hash keys to wrapped template tokens by ChemBoy (Priest) on Feb 19, 2002 at 02:15 UTC
strict is in there (just commented out for right now ;-) No, no, no, no, no! The whole point* of using `strict 'vars'` is to keep you from making mistakes during development. If you turn it off then, and only turn it on when you've ironed out all the bugs, you're depriving yourself of the best typo-protector you could have. Same goes for -w, while I'm at it... </RANT> * Possibly untrue, but reasonable in context... If God had meant us to fly, he would never have given us the railroads. --Michael Flanders	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^5: Do regex using hash keys to wrapped template tokens
by ChemBoy (Priest) on Feb 19, 2002 at 02:15 UTC

strict is in there (just commented out for right now ;-)

No, no, no, no, no! The whole point* of using strict 'vars' is to keep you from making mistakes during development. If you turn it off then, and only turn it on when you've ironed out all the bugs, you're depriving yourself of the best typo-protector you could have.

Same goes for -w, while I'm at it...

</RANT>

* Possibly untrue, but reasonable in context...

If God had meant us to fly, he would *never* have given us the railroads.
--Michael Flanders

[reply]