in reply to RE: RE: Employment Status
in thread Employment Status

Okay, maybe, possibly, I could concede the point. But I'll be grumpy about it. Frankly, I must question your logic -- a site like perlmonks is the holy grail of the headhunter. But maybe it will remain untainted.

And no, I don't want to leave Happy comPany. At least not for some fly-by-night operation in Rio... :-)

e-mail neshura

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: RE: RE: Employment Status
by BBQ (Curate) on May 25, 2000 at 18:43 UTC
    Rio? RIO?? Jeez, I wish I was in Rio...

    Well, let me put it this way: there's nothing stopping a headhunter from posting as AM on SOPW, for instance, and we haven't seen any of that yet. I don't think we will either, because in a sense, I agree that perlmonks is the holy grail of the headhunters: they are in search of something that will never be found. :o)

    I don't think that vroom's intention is to publicize(?) the site much, its probably the other way around. Not calling attention of the corp-hype-web-world is a good way to keep things clean and honest.
[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion