Sometimes easier said than done. For instance look at
I refuse to explain this. The reason for said refusal is that
Dominus literally did not know how to explain it.
Incidentally "saint level" refers to participation on the
site, and not Perl knowledge. For instance TheDamian may
not be a saint (OK, so he seems to work for the Other Side,
details), but certainly knows more Perl than the vast
majority of the people in Saints in Our Book. | [reply] |
So you want to make it a requirement?
(i'm sorry, but I don't fully understand, what is your proposal?)
Having the author post the obfu with an explanation would serisously hinder the ability of
some
xp
whores to earn a livin' :)
| [reply] |
Althought sounds like a great idea, I don't think I'd like to see it done that way. For one, I savor the chance of deciphering obfuscated code and would hate it if the answer was already there prepared for me. I think posting a clearer version of obfuscated code would only spoil the fun of trying to get it.
On the other hand, as I think of it, the author might include a link to a page where his/her obfu code is explained in detail. This will let monks decide whether to first try to solve the obfu code on your own and than verify with the author's explanation, or simply cheat and look up the simpliefied version of the obfu code instead. I'd prefer the first option.
;)
|
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels." -- Confession of Faith
|
| [reply] |