Re: CGI.pm for HTML output?

No, it's not a big deal. It's usually better to use templates though. You might look at my article on the subject if you want more details.

Comment on Re: CGI.pm for HTML output?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: CGI.pm for HTML output? by mr.dunstan (Monk) on Mar 08, 2002 at 22:34 UTC
Stick your HTML into CGI.pm when you already have good HTML? Just like teenage suicide: "Don't do it!" -mr.dunstan	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: CGI.pm for HTML output? by perrin (Chancellor) on Mar 08, 2002 at 22:41 UTC
Uh, yeah, that's what I said. Or are you just agreeing with me?	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Re: CGI.pm for HTML output? by mr.dunstan (Monk) on Mar 12, 2002 at 02:19 UTC
Sorry, I got all excited. I just watched that movie again. -mr.dunstan	[reply]