in reply to RFC: RPC_OO.pm
package RPC_OO;
This is not a CPAN-worthy script (yet), because it has very bad error handling (if any). Referencing a global special scalar ($@ here) is probably not a very good idea. There are two kinds of false wantarrays, namely defined and undefined - you should think about handling them both.
RPC_OO is a bad package name, because it's top-level, and there already are a lot of RPC modules in the RPC:: namespace. _IF_ (and I think you really should not) you decide to put this on CPAN, at least rename it to RPC::OO.
And all modules should have detailed documentation, of course!
I haven't used RPC in any way, but I think it needs to be easy to use. That is, I think you should know only a line or five to get it running, and not have to copy/paste a given synopsis.
U28geW91IGNhbiBhbGwgcm90MTMgY
W5kIHBhY2soKS4gQnV0IGRvIHlvdS
ByZWNvZ25pc2UgQmFzZTY0IHdoZW4
geW91IHNlZSBpdD8gIC0tIEp1ZXJk
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: RFC: RPC_OO.pm
by Necos (Friar) on Mar 18, 2002 at 11:29 UTC |