Re: Re: Style geekcode

it's a shame that I can't specify NO spaces around an operator.

You can!! Just have the operator without "<" or ">". Your code would be:

S,><.><+><**><=><&&><and>++<gt><==>
[download]

I'll add a bit of clarification to the root node

U28geW91IGNhbiBhbGwgcm90MTMgY
W5kIHBhY2soKS4gQnV0IGRvIHlvdS
ByZWNvZ25pc2UgQmFzZTY0IHdoZW4
geW91IHNlZSBpdD8gIC0tIEp1ZXJk

Comment on Re: Re: Style geekcode Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Style geekcode by buckaduck (Chaplain) on Mar 25, 2002 at 17:16 UTC
In your example, how do you distinguish between these? `++ <gt> ++< gt>` [download] Update: Apparently he does it by reading the specs more carefully than I did. My bad. buckaduck	[reply] [d/l]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Style geekcode by Juerd (Abbot) on Mar 25, 2002 at 17:24 UTC
In your example, how do you distinguish between these? `++ <gt> ++< gt>` [download] You don't have to. Both mean: No space with ++ A space on both sides of comparison operators (except for ==) Valid ++ codes are: `++ <++ # These three ++> # have the <++> # same meaning` [download] So with "++<", the less-than sign is always part of the expression that comes after ++. U28geW91IGNhbiBhbGwgcm90MTMgY W5kIHBhY2soKS4gQnV0IGRvIHlvdS ByZWNvZ25pc2UgQmFzZTY0IHdoZW4 geW91IHNlZSBpdD8gIC0tIEp1ZXJk	[reply] [d/l] [select]