"... you're taking a pretty too-much-assumed defense
here."
Guilty as charged. Sorry if i broke karma.
"What else he could do? Don't post at all?"
I think posting the final version would have been much
more appropriate, then the link would have provided
'extra bonus material' for anyone interested.
Add kudos to you DaWolf for bringing up community.
jeffa
L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L--
-R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR
B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B--
H---H---H---H---H---H---
(the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)
| [reply] |
...I'm strongly behind this position as clarified here.
I think posting the final version would have been much more appropriate, then the link would have provided
'extra bonus material' for anyone interested.
Certainly a blind policy of downvoting anything that links
to an offsite resource would be negative. There are many good
reasons that offsite links would be appropriate.
It sounds like there might have been some other issues
but those seem to have been worked out.
Add kudos to you DaWolf for bringing up community.
And thanks to all here for demonstrating it. (A revised and
clarified position, a new post with the cleaner access
to the code, and the general sense that we should do
whatever seems most reasonable to us, as long as we're
willing to occasionally reconsider our definition of
reasonable. I'm in!)
---v
| [reply] |