in reply to Re: (crazyinsomniac: oh i'm excited) Re: new XML module
in thread new XML module

shotgunefx: I don't wanna guess gav^s intent, because it is not relevant to my complaint. I am glad this has been brough to my attention. The only way to remedy uncool behaviour without a real deterrant is through communication. I already sent my complaint to grantm@cpan.org

update: Shoot the messanger? I wanted to shoot dws there for a second, who seemed more approving than he should (it hurts me to see good monks with impaired judgment), but I by no mean wanted gav^ shot. Just, due to the lack of the smily (;) which you later filled in as your interpretation, I wanted to know what he really thought. Anyway, i'm glad we all understand each other now (and i'd have openly said --shooot-- him if that's what I meant ~ very rarely am I subtle ~ some people like not having to wonder)

 
______crazyinsomniac_____________________________
Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most.
perl -e "$q=$_;map({chr unpack qq;H*;,$_}split(q;;,q*H*));print;$q/$q;"

  • Comment on Re: Re: (crazyinsomniac: oh i'm excited) Re: new XML module

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: (crazyinsomniac: oh i'm excited) Re: new XML module
by shotgunefx (Parson) on Apr 02, 2002 at 09:12 UTC
    As I had stated in my first reply, I think it was dumb of him to do this. He could have achieved virtually the same laugh without mucking up CPAN. I just thought there was a bit of the "shoot the messanger" in your first reply to gav^ but it was probably just me.

    -Lee

    "To be civilized is to deny one's nature."