in reply to Friendly home node

I have no answers but I agree with FoxtrotUniform this is a mighty slippery slope. How many JavascriptMonks would like to see AgentM's node disinfected? I don't especially care for the image, and I could see it falling under the abuse clause (though I can think of other things that would be more clearly so). The text is juvenile. It's one think to have an opinion, it's another thing to spout slander/propaganda/conspiracy without evidence. However, frankly it just confirms my opinion of the monk in question. And if that is the image he wishes to portray, so be it.

--
perl -pe "s/\b;([st])/'\1/mg"