in reply to Re: Re: Re: (3): Perl 6 will make amends (was:Perl's Bad Ideas)
in thread Perl's Bad Ideas
That is, you'd need to be able to write something like:
sub findone (&matcher, *@list) { ... do_caching() if want.arg_of =~ ('while','until'); }
I don't see any reason why this kind of (compile-time discernible) information shouldn't be made available, especially since creating new control structures via subroutines will likely be far more common in Perl 6.
I'll see what Larry thinks.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: (8): Perl 6 will make amends (was:Perl's Bad Ideas)
by shotgunefx (Parson) on Apr 10, 2002 at 00:59 UTC |