in reply to DBIx::Recordset article (please review)

i'm sorry, but i do not consider this a topic for "Perl Monks Discussion".

here is the description of the purpose of this section from the Site How To page:

This is where users can discuss features they might like to see. Why the XP system kicks/sucks etc.... this is the place for site related issues.... not Perl problems.

this topic is in no way "site related".

p.s. please don't provide URL's for us to visit without making them hyperlinks. i might have read your article if it had been linked (even though discussing it here is still off-topic), but there's no way i will do so as it stands. you presume too much of our willingness to labor selflessly to your ends.

(i figure if i'm going to get voted down for being a bitch in my explanation, i may as well explain all my grievances at once.)

  • Comment on RE: DBIx::Recordset article (please review)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: DBIx::Recordset article (please review)
by BBQ (Curate) on Jun 04, 2000 at 19:56 UTC
    Not to mention that this is a re-post from "Please review my article". I don't understand what good it does to post the same requests several times. If we didn't comment on it the 1st time around, its not likely that we'll do it the second, third or fourth. This can become very annoying.

    BTW: I'd post it to Meditations.

    #!/home/bbq/bin/perl
    # Trust no1!
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.