Re: Sending HTML Mail

I seem to recall something about using multipart/alternative as type instead of multipart/related, but I am not sure. It might be worth a shot? Either way, it is *probably* a header problem if different email clients present it differently.

You have moved into a dark place.
It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

Comment on Re: Sending HTML Mail Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Sending HTML Mail by neilwatson (Priest) on May 03, 2002 at 21:13 UTC
Tried `multipart/alternative`. Same result. Neil Watson watson-wilson.ca	[reply] [d/l]
Re: Re: Re: Sending HTML Mail by Fastolfe (Vicar) on May 04, 2002 at 16:20 UTC
Try nesting them. The multipart/alternative content type is meant more for saying "I can show you this type of content, or this type, you decide." You're doing it right with the multipart/related to combine images with an HTML content type. `multipart/alternative multipart/related text/html image/gif whatever/else text/plain (a plain-text version)` [download] If that doesn't work, I might want to see the actual output of your script, if you can reduce it to something small-ish.	[reply] [d/l]