in reply to SQL? We don't need no steenking SQL!

A lot of work for a solution that isn't really the most efficient. May I ask why you created this? I would probably have used an existing module, or maybe a second layer on Tie::File or GDBM_File.

Next question: why is the documentation in comments, not in POD? POD is really easy to learn, and can be converted to a number of formats, including HTML. 

- Yes, I reinvent wheels.
- Spam: Visit eurotraQ.

  • Comment on Re: SQL? We don't need no steenking SQL!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: SQL? We don't need no steenking SQL!
by kal (Hermit) on May 16, 2002 at 20:16 UTC

    Juerd say, "A lot of work for a solution that isn't really the most efficient. May I ask why you created this? I would probably have used an existing module..."

    Juerd say, (later, in his .sig ;) "Yes, I reinvent wheels."

    Kal say, "Juerd, you just made my day :)"

[reply]
    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

In Section Craft