in reply to Re: for ( ; ; ) vs for ( .. )
in thread for ( ; ; ) vs for ( .. )

Perhaps because its just not the same thing? Your's sets $_ to the elements of the array, while Popcorn Dave's sets $_ to one more than the indices of the array (which probably isn't the desired result). As broquaint suggests, I tend to use the for(0..$#ARGV) version if I happen to need the indices.

--
I'd like to be able to assign to an luser