in reply to Re: Re: How to instrument a "fake" subroutine?
in thread How to instrument a "fake" subroutine?

Note to self: Always read the fscking source first. I stand corrected, sorry 'bout that.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Oops...
by samtregar (Abbot) on May 24, 2002 at 22:07 UTC
    No problem. That was actually my assumption too. When I first caught this bug I thought there was something wrong with my constant-detection code. Then I looked in Fcntl.pm and saw what I was really dealing with.

    Which I suppose begs the question, why is Fcntl so damn clever? Is there something wrong with just exporting a constant sub for each symbol?

    -sam